|
Post by Bigboy on Feb 26, 2005 19:37:11 GMT -5
I thought the corruption was the problem. Corruption --> causes TU (like a bubble on the side of the universe) --> engine artifact. Fail to send back engine --> TU 'pops' --> corruption sucks everything in like a giant black hole destroying the universe.
|
|
John
Junior Member
Posts: 53
|
Post by John on Feb 26, 2005 20:13:25 GMT -5
Also, Donnie didn't actually choose to go back in time/back to the Primary Universe. He set the events in motion but almost indirectly because he was being manipulated by Frank and he didn't know how it would all unfold. He didn't have a choice.
At the end when he's on the Carpathian Ridge with the car and Gretchen's body, it's not like he was making a decision to go back, he was just watching it happen and looking at Gretchen because he loved her and he knew he was going to die in a matter of moments (at least I think he knew he would.)
The Tangent Universe had to end for two reasons. 1) is that according to the Philosophy of Time Travel, the Tangent Universe is unstable and can only sustain itself for a matter of weeks (28 days, 6 hours, 42 minutes, 12 seconds) before it collapses. An additional reason is that the definition of a tangent is intersecting at one and only one point. So if you think of the Primary Universe as a straight line, the Tangent Universe branches out from it when the jet engine falls through the sky on October 2, and that is the one and only point of intersection between the two universes. So the only way back to the Primary Universe was to go back in time.
|
|
|
Post by pedro2112guest on Aug 31, 2005 9:05:25 GMT -5
I thought as soon as the engine went back to the PU, the world was saved. When (at the end of the movie), the engine crashed through Donnie's roof and smote him, that was the PU. How would Donnie have known that the engine was about to come through the roof and kill him? After the TU is closed, the people in the PU (donnie included) only "remember" the TU through dreams, and even some have no memory whatsoever. There is no reason to suggest that Donnie was aware he was about to be killed and did nothing about it. He may have had a dream and remembered some stuff about the TU.. perhaps his laughter was due to him remembering a particularly nice part of the TU (kissing gretchen, hugging him mother, etc.).
To sum up, I think an equally logical (if not more so) explanation as to why Donnie died at the end was that he had no idea a jet engine was about to crash through his roof!
Am I missing something here?
|
|
|
Post by Bigboy on Aug 31, 2005 12:24:01 GMT -5
Not at all - I agree entirely. Although one point - the PoTT only specifies "The Manipulated" (living and dead) as remembering through dreams. Technically Donnie is niether, being a Living Reciever. So perhaps his "dream experinece" is a lot more vivd than the others'.
|
|
|
Post by ProvidencePortal on Aug 31, 2005 12:52:00 GMT -5
perhaps his "dream experinece" is a lot more vivd than the others'. Right. With this question, we're firmly in the world of interpreting, so there's no "right" answer. (In fact, the only definitive statement on the end -- why Donnie laughed -- was just more ambiguity from Kelly.) For me, viewing the movie only, minus the other canon texts (web site and PoTT), I'd guess Donnie laughs then gets squished because he's just awakened from the darndest dream. Gretchen was there, and Frank the rabbit, and Auntie Em ... isn't that something? *Splat* In this version, no awareness whatsoever of a grander scheme or his role in it. Viewing the movie through the lens of all canon, the end looks different to me. I see Donnie as completely aware that he has just successfully completed the Living Receiver cycle. He has connected with the divine by participating in its beyond-human plans, and knows we are all interconnected and interrelated in a way that ensures none of us can ever truly be alone. [He also understands that he has a choice to make: conclude the cycle appropriately, by dying ... or live and violate the system. One leads to enlightenment, the other to alienation. He makes the "right" (according to the system) choice.] He is pleased, relieved, amazed, filled with awe ... and laughs sweetly as the end comes. The bit in the brackets above is particularly contentious -- being almost entirely conjecture around the community drawn from trying to guess at who Sparrow is -- which is why I separated it from the rest. Otherwise, that's how I see the split of whether Donnie's aware and making a choice or unaware and just getting smooshed.
|
|
|
Post by pedro2112 on Aug 31, 2005 13:39:29 GMT -5
[He also understands that he has a choice to make: conclude the cycle appropriately, by dying ... or live and violate the system. One leads to enlightenment, the other to alienation. He makes the "right" (according to the system) choice.] Prov, on its face, this seems like an excellent analysis regarding DD's death.. the problem is that the creator of the movie stated clearly that DD didn't have to die in order to save the world. So if what you are saying was actually going through DD's mind at the end, then the ending is only more tragic because of DD's useless death. DD is a fairly sharp kid... there is nothing in the POTT to suggest that he needs to kill himself (unless I am missing something).. so even if he does remember the TU, there is no way he'd kill himself.. especially now that he knows he isn't crazy and that he could hook up with the new hot chic down the street.
|
|
|
Post by ProvidencePortal on Aug 31, 2005 15:27:43 GMT -5
the creator of the movie stated clearly that DD didn't have to die in order to save the world. I'm not suggesting at all that Donnie had to die to save the world. In fact, I'm wholly in the camp that says once the artifact was returned, the world was safe regardless of how or when Donnie's lifeline ended. What I am saying is that there's a theory that the Living Receiver cycle is not complete until the moment some object of death falls from the sky (see the reference in the PoTT to mysterious sword/arrow deaths). The PU is safe from the threat of the TU, but the Living Receiver him/herself still has a choice to make: to die or not. As the theory goes, the reward for concluding the cycle appropriately (nice euphamism for dying) is "finding out what this is all about," to paraphrase Donnie. The Living Receiver who trusts that s/he is not alone and ends the cycle by dying after saving the PU, so the theory goes, comes to understand God's grand plan. But, as you point out (and as I have, and many others), he doesn't have to die. The PU is safe. No swirling black hole of doom to collapse it. So Donnie -- or another LR -- could get out from under the crashing vehicle of death and go right on living. However, the theory says, life after the cycle isn't all it's cracked up to be. What happens is, you become a Roberta Sparrow. You're confused. Eccentric. Alienated by your weirdness. You act out bizarre twitches and repetitive behaviors, like going back and forth to the mailbox -- echoes of a future you already know in a dreamy recollection because of your LR experience. You're doomed to watch for the rest of your life for the LR for whom you will play a key role. Anywho, that's the theory. And as you can see, it resides in a metanarrative that's grown up out of pretty sparse grasses -- Sparrow's unique role, the fact that Donnie dies at all, his laugh at the end -- and lots of community discussion to try to piece the story together. I like it. There's not much evidence to point to that it's "right" ... but of course, show me a part of DD that's "right," and someone else will quote the movie, the web site, the PoTT or an interview with Kelly to counter the point. Other spots for interesting reading on Donnie's death here include: darkomovie.proboards24.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=psych&thread=1069002456&page=3darkomovie.proboards24.com/index.cgi?board=ending&action=display&thread=1114312592&page=1darkomovie.proboards24.com/index.cgi?action=display&board=ending&thread=1095872475&page=1
|
|
|
Post by pedro2112 on Aug 31, 2005 16:58:58 GMT -5
I'm not suggesting at all that Donnie had to die to save the world. In fact, I'm wholly in the camp that says once the artifact was returned, the world was safe regardless of how or when Donnie's lifeline ended. What I am saying is that there's a theory that the Living Receiver cycle is not complete until the moment some object of death falls from the sky (see the reference in the PoTT to mysterious sword/arrow deaths). . I've reread POTT, and I think this theory is very plausible. Why else would the past LRs end up dieing from the artifact? I assume that they all missed being killed by the artifact in the TU (because they were pulled away by the MD from the falling sword, arrow, etc..), and that when the TU was destroyed by the LR's sending the artifact back to the PU, then they died themselves. I wonder if Sparrow was ever an LR, considering she is still alive? I don't think I"ve read or seen anywhere that a bizarre event (artifact) occured in her lifetime. * editHowever, none of this still precludes that the reason he died was due to him being unaware that a large piece of metal was about to fall on top of him. In the previous LR examples (the sword, arrow), the same thing could have happened to them... an MD pulled them away from the artifact in the TU, they saved the PU by sending the artifact back, after coming back to the PU, they had no clear memory of the TU or what happned, so they didn't get out of the way of the artifact.
|
|
|
Post by ProvidencePortal on Sept 1, 2005 8:16:39 GMT -5
none of this still precludes that the reason he died was due to him being unaware that's right. the idea that he died because he simply didn't know what was going to happen is exactly how some people see it. others see it as a more complex expression of the LR cycle. as is the magic of Darko, it could be either -- or neither, and something totally unrelated.
|
|
|
Post by pedro2112 on Sept 1, 2005 17:23:23 GMT -5
as is the magic of Darko, it could be either -- or neither, and something totally unrelated. Some call that 'magic', some would call it 'madness'!! ;D Whereas, a movie like Primer, one can actually "solve" it by just watching the movie (although no one has ever done that with only one viewing, as far as I know).
|
|
|
Post by ProvidencePortal on Sept 2, 2005 8:01:41 GMT -5
a movie like Primer, one can actually "solve" it by just watching the movie yes, Primer is an interesting, well-engineered movie. we've discussed it briefly in the "Other Great Movies" thread, if you'd like to continue the conversation. Now-occasional visitor GrandapaDeath is particularly a fan, and I spent some time untangling it after I watched it, too.
|
|
GrandpaDeath
Junior Member
All around me are familiar faces ...
Posts: 55
|
Post by GrandpaDeath on Sept 2, 2005 15:28:47 GMT -5
yes, Primer ... GrandapaDeath is particularly a fan, Huh, uh, wha? Sorry, I've been napping. Primer, yes! Lots of fun. check out primermovie.com/phpBB2/index.phpfor some interesting discussion about it.
|
|