Post by panserbjorne on May 31, 2010 19:18:34 GMT -5
Alright so I watched Donnie Darko (Director's cut. Haven't seen the original yet.) for the first time last weekend.
I've seen it 3 times since then, and I still don't fully understand the black holes part of the Philosophy of Time Travel.
Does it mean that every time a Tangent Universe collapses upon itself, does that mean that a black hole forms somewhere in the Primary Universe, but doesn't destroy it even though it can?
Or, does it mean that a black hole forms in the Primary Universe and it DOES destroy it, hence the need for a Living Receiver, who in turns saves the Primary Universe and so on and so forth.
OR is the part about the black holes completely pointless?
Personally, I don't believe that ANYTHING in this movie is pointless, and that every little detail plays a major roll in this movie, which is why it's so amazing.
I've seen it 3 times since then, and I still don't fully understand the black holes part of the Philosophy of Time Travel.
Does it mean that every time a Tangent Universe collapses upon itself, does that mean that a black hole forms somewhere in the Primary Universe, but doesn't destroy it even though it can?
Or, does it mean that a black hole forms in the Primary Universe and it DOES destroy it, hence the need for a Living Receiver, who in turns saves the Primary Universe and so on and so forth.
OR is the part about the black holes completely pointless?
Personally, I don't believe that ANYTHING in this movie is pointless, and that every little detail plays a major roll in this movie, which is why it's so amazing.
