|
|
Post by donniedarkochick on Jan 4, 2005 15:07:06 GMT -5
This movie is awesome...it made me think so much about time and dimensions and stuff...I like how philisophical it can get...Donnie darko kicks ass...
|
|
IC2
Junior Member
Do You See Me?
Posts: 89
|
Post by IC2 on Apr 16, 2005 14:45:09 GMT -5
You got that right DonnieDarkoChick.
BTW i love your sn. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by emma on Feb 1, 2006 23:10:25 GMT -5
that movie fucking messed me up i mean i love it but it changed me its so fucking weird
|
|
|
|
Post by MoonageDaydream on Feb 2, 2006 17:31:05 GMT -5
You can say that again!
Seriously. You better say it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProvidencePortal on Feb 3, 2006 8:46:26 GMT -5
Hilarious. My sense of humor, nailed.
*Exalt*
|
|
|
|
Post by MoonageDaydream on Feb 10, 2006 16:36:39 GMT -5
Cheers!
|
|
|
|
Post by darkangelxx on Mar 1, 2006 12:41:39 GMT -5
i tink d film dd makes u want to live life 2 d full and enjoy it while u can because u dnt no wen its gona end!!!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by darkangelxx on Mar 1, 2006 12:46:13 GMT -5
i tink d film dd makes u want to live life 2 d full and enjoy it while u can because u dnt no wen its gona end!!!!! sorry about the typing i will try and type properly from now on x x x |
|
|
|
Post by deem on Mar 2, 2006 5:43:28 GMT -5
if this has any one questioning the exsistence of God in a positive way i suggest that you veiw this.
XV
/G
(8/
XBBV
:GggB3~ <B$$0
(G0$@@@$0%( ^%$$$B3
^< <B@@@$03X ^B$$$B0^
/g@@$$$8 `g$$BG%`
8@@$$0^ (0$$B03`
`$@$Bg ^3B$$B0G^
/$B0g V0$$$Bg~
8gX/( 0$$$$BG
(B0003 (B$$$$B3
3$$$8X XB$$$00(
%BB8% %$$$00%
`88V G0$00V
/C%X^ ^G0Cg/
g00B8( <8V8/
X0%Gg00C ```<
`B$B8G%%X ` ` ^%^
(BB3^` <^ `` `/(``<VBg
0g<<<<. ` ` ``<VG8G0(
GGV`^(^^ ` `%G8/gg`
(G%( `<(` ` <(38G(`3g3
<3C3(^` ^<~^^`` ^<<(Gg%
~g%V3V ` `X3gg8GVVVV^^/3ggg0<
Vg8VC38838$$$$0B0g0@@$$$$33g$V
g003/^`XB$$G%0B00g$@$$@@$$$$$$^
~0$BB00$$$$@@@$G^.X$@@@@@@@@@@@3
/g$$0B@@gvxcg$$8 X$@@$BGgB@@@@g
V8BG<%0GCVX/(/8V C0g3V388g$@0bb
%80%^^(CG8g8%CC3%%G0X/XC%888%g$B
XGg$$0GVVVVX<`%@@@@$%CC380$@@@@0
<%%8$$@@$0X~^<X/380B3V3B@@@@@@@b^
`GgG0@@@@b%V<^V(X3XC8g0$@@@@@@@$`
Cg0$@@@@$$@$8g@@b$@@@@@@@@@@@@b
`<//%Gg$@@@@$@b$@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@g
`30$$0g880$@@$$$@$@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$`
3@@$8g0$080B@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$(
<B0GC%G8B$$00$@@@@$$@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@0<~
`(08%8G33%0B$BB$@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$0%^
^/C3%%%08G888Gg0B$$$$@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@$GX<
|
|
|
|
Post by deem on Mar 2, 2006 5:45:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Bigboy on Mar 2, 2006 8:10:56 GMT -5
Well, I watched it. I don't wish to offend you - you have the right to believe what you want to, but science was pretty thin on the ground in that video.
Logic was not very rigorously applied. He made two assumptions (other than "you exist"):
1. The quoted athiest view is typical of non-belivers.
I personally have never met any Athiest/Scientist who holds that the universe is eternal and without a beginning. Every single one I know of concedes the validity of the Big Bang.
The assumption that God is the only explanation for the Big Bang, assumes the existence of God in the "logical proof" that God must exist.
2. That the two views quoted are the only two.
The inference being that if one can be invalidated then the other must be true - there are plenty of points of view that don't fall under the two presented, so finding a flaw in one does not validate the other.
If anything that video encourages an agnostic point of view; niether one extreme nor the other. Proof is entirely unavailable for the existence or non-existence of God - so an assumption either way is unscientific.
|
|
