|
|
Post by ProvidencePortal on Oct 6, 2004 9:16:39 GMT -5
Holy moses -- is that you? Or did you find that pic somewhere?
|
|
|
|
Post by Omnipotent on Oct 6, 2004 10:48:06 GMT -5
No I found it, I think that's a little too much, I like the film but damn. Would you get that?
|
|
|
|
Post by Madridarko on Oct 6, 2004 18:39:14 GMT -5
A bit too much exagerated. It looks non-permament.
|
|
|
|
Post by ProvidencePortal on Oct 7, 2004 9:41:03 GMT -5
While I think the life-lessons in Darko are interesting, I don't think the characters in the movie pass my own personal "should it be a tattoo?" test, which is to ask: will my kids get the meaning of this thirty years from now?
|
|
|
|
Post by Omnipotent on Oct 7, 2004 10:32:52 GMT -5
Haha very true. My Grandfather had a tattoo of my Grandma and it looked like an aztec mask after being on his arm for 30 years, you get the point.
|
|
|
|
Post by Madridarko on Oct 7, 2004 16:03:34 GMT -5
I wonder why is it that tattos turn all soggy/deformed as the years go by? Maybe it is just the skin which loosens up and wrinkles.
|
|
|
|
Post by Madridarko on Oct 7, 2004 16:07:20 GMT -5
Eventhough i just think that the whole movie is the best movie in the world and that that picture is a masterpiece, I think that it would be too complex for a tatoo.  |
|
|
|
Post by Buu on Oct 12, 2004 21:19:39 GMT -5
I'd get Frank the Rabbit tattoed. I don't care much for the one in the picture, nor would I want all the characters faces in the tat, but Frank is just plain cool-looking.
|
|
|
|
Post by Madridarko on Oct 13, 2004 18:57:30 GMT -5
But it is just a bit way tooo excesive. Ok maybe a small frank the bunny rabbit might pass the test, but not a huge all back one like the that one.
|
|
