|
Author | Topic: So.. the scientists are from 2002..? (Read 777 times) |
doomed New Member
 member is offline
Joined: Jan 2008 Posts: 1 Karma: 1 |  | So.. the scientists are from 2002..? « Thread Started on Jan 9, 2008, 6:17am » | |
Screenshot:
![[image]](http://i123.photobucket.com/albums/o299/d00m3d/dd2002.jpg)
Comment / Discuss! 
Note: These images from the Director's Cut were designed in 2004.
| |
|
Bigboy Moderator
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b75/bigjoe1979/MyAvatar.jpg)
"Perhaps not eating people is the first step to making friends."
Joined: Oct 2004 Gender: Male  Posts: 1,031 Location: Portsmouth, England Karma: 20 |  | Re: So.. the scientists are from 2002..? « Reply #1 on Jan 9, 2008, 1:52pm » | |
Nice find!
Could be a date stamp for that version of the Kernel I suppose (rather than when it ran...)
| And, isn't sanity really just a one-trick pony anyway? I mean all you get is one trick, rational thinking, but when you're good and crazy, oooh, the sky is the limit!
"I was touched by His Noodly Appendage" |
|
Phil God
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.autocentre.ua/ac/03/16/images/11/m/kaw-zr1000-black.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2005 Gender: Male  Posts: 544 Location: Newcastle, UK Karma: 6 |  | Re: So.. the scientists are from 2002..? « Reply #2 on Aug 13, 2009, 6:46am » | |
haha, only just seen this thread
so who was it? come on, own up!
| |
|
ProvidencePortal Moderator
     member is offline
Don't mistake criticism for detraction -- a critic loves his medium; a detractor hates himself.
Joined: Sept 2004 Gender: Male  Posts: 1,247 Location: Columbus, OH Karma: 24 |  | Re: So.. the scientists are from 2002..? « Reply #3 on Aug 13, 2009, 10:36am » | |
Arggghh.
So fed up with seeing only a tiny dot in place of pics online. I appreciate security. But while a coffin might be very safe, I don't want to live in one.
What's the photo of?
| Alice: "I don't want to be among mad people." Cheshire cat: "Oh, you can't help that. We're all quite mad here." |
|
Phil God
     member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.autocentre.ua/ac/03/16/images/11/m/kaw-zr1000-black.jpg)
Joined: Jan 2005 Gender: Male  Posts: 544 Location: Newcastle, UK Karma: 6 |  | Re: So.. the scientists are from 2002..? « Reply #4 on Aug 14, 2009, 5:29am » | |
in the directors cut, when everthings purging theres a big eye with sea view fade pasted on it and source codes running down the screen
| |
|
twinkle Senior Member
    member is offline
![[avatar]](http://www.virginmedia.com/microsites/movies/slideshow/toptensexscenes/img_8.jpg)
maybe next time...
Joined: Mar 2007 Gender: Male  Posts: 365 Karma: 22 |  | Re: So.. the scientists are from 2002..? « Reply #5 on Aug 15, 2009, 10:41am » | |
^and near the bottom of the "screen" is
"Fri Sep 6 23:09:31 PDT 2002"
| We are all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars. |
|
ProvidencePortal Moderator
     member is offline
Don't mistake criticism for detraction -- a critic loves his medium; a detractor hates himself.
Joined: Sept 2004 Gender: Male  Posts: 1,247 Location: Columbus, OH Karma: 24 |  | Re: So.. the scientists are from 2002..? « Reply #6 on Aug 25, 2009, 11:58am » | |
Ah. Thanks you guys.
| Alice: "I don't want to be among mad people." Cheshire cat: "Oh, you can't help that. We're all quite mad here." |
|
|